<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 313 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71618</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Diagnostic Centre did not qualify as an industrial undertaking and was not entitled to the investment allowance under section 32A. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the partial disallowance of inauguration expenses. The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:12:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 313 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71618</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Diagnostic Centre did not qualify as an industrial undertaking and was not entitled to the investment allowance under section 32A. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the partial disallowance of inauguration expenses. The appeal of the Revenue was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>