<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 240 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71607</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee to adopt the fair market value as on 1-4-1981 for computing capital gains, held that no capital gains arose from the sale of coupons, and allowed the interest on borrowings as a business expense. The Tribunal disagreed with the Assessing Officer&#039;s computation of capital gains on the sale of shares and bonus shares, ruling that the fair market value as on 1-4-1981 could be adopted. The Tribunal also disagreed with the tax treatment of receipts from the sale of coupons, stating that no capital gains arose due to the lack of identifiable cost of acquisition. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the interest on borrowings, emphasizing that it was for business purposes and thus allowable under section 36.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:12:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 240 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71607</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee to adopt the fair market value as on 1-4-1981 for computing capital gains, held that no capital gains arose from the sale of coupons, and allowed the interest on borrowings as a business expense. The Tribunal disagreed with the Assessing Officer&#039;s computation of capital gains on the sale of shares and bonus shares, ruling that the fair market value as on 1-4-1981 could be adopted. The Tribunal also disagreed with the tax treatment of receipts from the sale of coupons, stating that no capital gains arose due to the lack of identifiable cost of acquisition. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the interest on borrowings, emphasizing that it was for business purposes and thus allowable under section 36.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>