<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 190 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71581</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]&#039;s power to enhance assessments based on new sources of income, as established in previous court decisions. The CIT(A) was justified in enhancing the assessment due to under-valuation of stock and disallowance under section 43B. However, the disallowance of interest under section 40(b) was modified to exclude interest paid before the individual became a partner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:33:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 190 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71581</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]&#039;s power to enhance assessments based on new sources of income, as established in previous court decisions. The CIT(A) was justified in enhancing the assessment due to under-valuation of stock and disallowance under section 43B. However, the disallowance of interest under section 40(b) was modified to exclude interest paid before the individual became a partner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>