<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 137 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71568</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that non-furnishing of the return within the stipulated period does not amount to concealment of income for existing assessees. As the income in question was disclosed in the return filed later, and the assessee was not covered by Explanation 3 to section 271(1)(c), the penalty imposed under that section was cancelled, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 16:52:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 137 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71568</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that non-furnishing of the return within the stipulated period does not amount to concealment of income for existing assessees. As the income in question was disclosed in the return filed later, and the assessee was not covered by Explanation 3 to section 271(1)(c), the penalty imposed under that section was cancelled, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>