<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 199 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71555</link>
    <description>The miscellaneous application filed by the assessee to rectify mistakes apparent from the record under sec. 254(2) of the Income Tax Act was dismissed. The Tribunal&#039;s decision not to follow certain case law did not amount to an apparent mistake, and the Tribunal&#039;s power to rectify mistakes does not extend to reviewing its own decisions on merits. Therefore, the Tribunal&#039;s original decision was upheld, and the miscellaneous application was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:56:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 199 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71555</link>
      <description>The miscellaneous application filed by the assessee to rectify mistakes apparent from the record under sec. 254(2) of the Income Tax Act was dismissed. The Tribunal&#039;s decision not to follow certain case law did not amount to an apparent mistake, and the Tribunal&#039;s power to rectify mistakes does not extend to reviewing its own decisions on merits. Therefore, the Tribunal&#039;s original decision was upheld, and the miscellaneous application was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>