<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 145 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71550</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the prima facie adjustments under section 143(1)(a) were debatable and not within the scope of the provision. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that issuing an intimation under section 143(1)(a) after sending a notice under section 143(2) was invalid. As a result, the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:43:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 145 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71550</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the prima facie adjustments under section 143(1)(a) were debatable and not within the scope of the provision. Additionally, the Tribunal determined that issuing an intimation under section 143(1)(a) after sending a notice under section 143(2) was invalid. As a result, the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>