<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 143 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71548</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the salary income for assessment years 1987-88 to 1992-93 should not be treated as undisclosed income. The Tribunal found that the salary disclosed by the employer with tax deducted at source constituted proper disclosure, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s interpretation was incorrect. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, dismissing the issues related to deductions and credit for tax deducted at source in light of its decision on the primary issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:39:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 143 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71548</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the salary income for assessment years 1987-88 to 1992-93 should not be treated as undisclosed income. The Tribunal found that the salary disclosed by the employer with tax deducted at source constituted proper disclosure, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s interpretation was incorrect. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, dismissing the issues related to deductions and credit for tax deducted at source in light of its decision on the primary issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>