<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 111 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71545</link>
    <description>The Assessing Officer&#039;s assessments under section 158BD were deemed illegal and void ab initio as proper jurisdiction was lacking, and income was attributed to the main individual. Protective assessments for family members were canceled due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s findings. Specific income related to a Beauty Parlour was not considered undisclosed income. The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees, allowing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:31:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 111 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71545</link>
      <description>The Assessing Officer&#039;s assessments under section 158BD were deemed illegal and void ab initio as proper jurisdiction was lacking, and income was attributed to the main individual. Protective assessments for family members were canceled due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s findings. Specific income related to a Beauty Parlour was not considered undisclosed income. The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees, allowing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>