<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 155 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71526</link>
    <description>The 12% amount under section 23(1A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was treated as part of compensation for compulsory acquisition, not as interest. The provision uses the term &quot;amount&quot; and operates within the compensation scheme, while interest for delayed payment is separately dealt with under sections 28 and 34. On that basis, the payment was additional compensation and not taxable as income from other sources, so the addition was rightly deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109848" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 155 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71526</link>
      <description>The 12% amount under section 23(1A) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was treated as part of compensation for compulsory acquisition, not as interest. The provision uses the term &quot;amount&quot; and operates within the compensation scheme, while interest for delayed payment is separately dealt with under sections 28 and 34. On that basis, the payment was additional compensation and not taxable as income from other sources, so the addition was rightly deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>