<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 193 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71513</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune ruled in appeals against the CIT&#039;s order under section 263 regarding penalty proceedings for concealed income for assessment years 1989-90 and 1990-91. The Tribunal held that the CIT&#039;s order was misconceived as the additions were based on an agreement with specified conditions precluding penalty proceedings. It emphasized that the assessment orders were lawful and could not be revised under section 263. The Tribunal found that the department was estopped from initiating penalty proceedings due to the agreed conditions, quashing the CIT&#039;s order and ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:35:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 193 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71513</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune ruled in appeals against the CIT&#039;s order under section 263 regarding penalty proceedings for concealed income for assessment years 1989-90 and 1990-91. The Tribunal held that the CIT&#039;s order was misconceived as the additions were based on an agreement with specified conditions precluding penalty proceedings. It emphasized that the assessment orders were lawful and could not be revised under section 263. The Tribunal found that the department was estopped from initiating penalty proceedings due to the agreed conditions, quashing the CIT&#039;s order and ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>