<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 192 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71511</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the Commissioner&#039;s decision on the erroneous deduction under section 80HHC due to non-filing of Form No. 10CCAB during assessment. However, it found the deductions for unpaid sales tax and unpaid bonus were correctly allowed by the Assessing Officer and did not require rectification under section 263.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:30:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 192 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71511</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the Commissioner&#039;s decision on the erroneous deduction under section 80HHC due to non-filing of Form No. 10CCAB during assessment. However, it found the deductions for unpaid sales tax and unpaid bonus were correctly allowed by the Assessing Officer and did not require rectification under section 263.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>