<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 128 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71502</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 10,97,062 under section 40A(3), ruling that the assessee failed to prove exceptional or unavoidable circumstances justifying cash payments. The Tribunal emphasized the legislative intent to prevent bogus claims and ensure proper accounting. The decision was against the assessee, highlighting that the disputed payments were a small percentage of total sales.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 128 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71502</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 10,97,062 under section 40A(3), ruling that the assessee failed to prove exceptional or unavoidable circumstances justifying cash payments. The Tribunal emphasized the legislative intent to prevent bogus claims and ensure proper accounting. The decision was against the assessee, highlighting that the disputed payments were a small percentage of total sales.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>