<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (12) TMI 108 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71474</link>
    <description>Excess provision for taxation existing on the first day of the previous year was treated as a reserve for capital computation under Rule 1 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. The text applies the principle that a provision for a known liability, to the extent it exceeds what is reasonably necessary, assumes the character of reserve and is not excluded merely because it is later written back. Rule 1A is cited as supporting the same approach, since adjustment for a short or absent provision implies that an excess provision remains part of capital at the opening date. The excess amount was therefore includible in general reserve and in the assessee&#039;s capital computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:48:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109796" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (12) TMI 108 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71474</link>
      <description>Excess provision for taxation existing on the first day of the previous year was treated as a reserve for capital computation under Rule 1 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964. The text applies the principle that a provision for a known liability, to the extent it exceeds what is reasonably necessary, assumes the character of reserve and is not excluded merely because it is later written back. Rule 1A is cited as supporting the same approach, since adjustment for a short or absent provision implies that an excess provision remains part of capital at the opening date. The excess amount was therefore includible in general reserve and in the assessee&#039;s capital computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>