<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (12) TMI 106 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71472</link>
    <description>An unincorporated members&#039; club was treated as an association of persons but not as a taxable unit under the Wealth-tax Act, because section 3 did not contemplate such a club as an individual or other assessable entity. The scheme of section 4(1)(b) and rule 2 supported taxation at the level of the individual member, not the club. Section 21AA did not alter that position for a members&#039; club, since members had no present share in the club&#039;s income or assets and only a contingent right on dissolution. The later amendment to section 45 also reinforced the view that social clubs remained outside wealth-tax liability, so the revenue&#039;s appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:44:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (12) TMI 106 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71472</link>
      <description>An unincorporated members&#039; club was treated as an association of persons but not as a taxable unit under the Wealth-tax Act, because section 3 did not contemplate such a club as an individual or other assessable entity. The scheme of section 4(1)(b) and rule 2 supported taxation at the level of the individual member, not the club. Section 21AA did not alter that position for a members&#039; club, since members had no present share in the club&#039;s income or assets and only a contingent right on dissolution. The later amendment to section 45 also reinforced the view that social clubs remained outside wealth-tax liability, so the revenue&#039;s appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>