<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (12) TMI 105 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71471</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of investment allowance and reversed the allowance of depreciation for stallions and mares used in breeding racehorses, following the decision that animals, including horses, do not qualify as plant under the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal also allowed vehicle maintenance expenses claimed by the assessee, emphasizing their necessity for business purposes and commercial expediency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:43:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (12) TMI 105 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71471</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of investment allowance and reversed the allowance of depreciation for stallions and mares used in breeding racehorses, following the decision that animals, including horses, do not qualify as plant under the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal also allowed vehicle maintenance expenses claimed by the assessee, emphasizing their necessity for business purposes and commercial expediency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>