<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (10) TMI 144 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71467</link>
    <description>For gift-tax valuation, the market value of a gifted plot is to reflect the price it would fetch in the open market on the relevant date, and a claimed reduction for unearned increase is not allowable where the society&#039;s transfer rule exempts transfers to an immediate family member or legal heir from that burden. In that situation, the obligation is not a deductible incident of the property itself, only a nominal transfer fee is payable, and the full market value remains the proper valuation base. The revisional order under section 24 of the Gift Tax Act was therefore justified, and the assessee&#039;s challenge to the valuation failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:36:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (10) TMI 144 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71467</link>
      <description>For gift-tax valuation, the market value of a gifted plot is to reflect the price it would fetch in the open market on the relevant date, and a claimed reduction for unearned increase is not allowable where the society&#039;s transfer rule exempts transfers to an immediate family member or legal heir from that burden. In that situation, the obligation is not a deductible incident of the property itself, only a nominal transfer fee is payable, and the full market value remains the proper valuation base. The revisional order under section 24 of the Gift Tax Act was therefore justified, and the assessee&#039;s challenge to the valuation failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>