<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 146 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71454</link>
    <description>Contemporaneous records and corroborative statements can satisfy the assessee&#039;s burden under section 69A when gold ornaments are shown to be recorded in books, lying with artisans, or belonging to identified third parties. The revenue&#039;s reliance on Central Excise material did not displace that explanation for income-tax purposes. On that basis, no unexplained investment was established in the seized gold ornaments, and section 69A was held inapplicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:56:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 146 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71454</link>
      <description>Contemporaneous records and corroborative statements can satisfy the assessee&#039;s burden under section 69A when gold ornaments are shown to be recorded in books, lying with artisans, or belonging to identified third parties. The revenue&#039;s reliance on Central Excise material did not displace that explanation for income-tax purposes. On that basis, no unexplained investment was established in the seized gold ornaments, and section 69A was held inapplicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>