<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 116 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71436</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, ruling that the compensation paid to the retiring partner was not deductible as a revenue expense under Section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act. The expenditure was classified as capital in nature, emphasizing that a partnership firm does not possess a distinct legal personality from its partners. The appeal by the assessee was dismissed based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 14:32:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 116 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71436</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, ruling that the compensation paid to the retiring partner was not deductible as a revenue expense under Section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act. The expenditure was classified as capital in nature, emphasizing that a partnership firm does not possess a distinct legal personality from its partners. The appeal by the assessee was dismissed based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>