<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (10) TMI 122 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71391</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Income Tax Officer (ITO) lacked the authority to levy a penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1971-72. Explanation 2 to section 271(1)(c) cannot be applied retrospectively, and the penalty provisions are substantive, impacting the assessee&#039;s rights. The penalty imposed was canceled, and the appeal was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:32:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (10) TMI 122 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71391</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Income Tax Officer (ITO) lacked the authority to levy a penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1971-72. Explanation 2 to section 271(1)(c) cannot be applied retrospectively, and the penalty provisions are substantive, impacting the assessee&#039;s rights. The penalty imposed was canceled, and the appeal was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>