<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 313 - ITAT PUNE-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71381</link>
    <description>An appeal arising from block assessment proceedings does not permit the Tribunal to test the pre-search authorisation under section 132(1) or the existence of conditions for approving a search; such a challenge lies in writ jurisdiction. On the facts noted, the search warrants and panchanamas identified the searched premises and persons, the warrant was executed against the family members named, and the absence of full names, separate panchanamas for each individual, or recorded statements during search did not invalidate the search proceedings. The assessee&#039;s challenge to the search warrant was therefore rejected as outside the statutory appeal and unsupported on the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 16:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 313 - ITAT PUNE-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71381</link>
      <description>An appeal arising from block assessment proceedings does not permit the Tribunal to test the pre-search authorisation under section 132(1) or the existence of conditions for approving a search; such a challenge lies in writ jurisdiction. On the facts noted, the search warrants and panchanamas identified the searched premises and persons, the warrant was executed against the family members named, and the absence of full names, separate panchanamas for each individual, or recorded statements during search did not invalidate the search proceedings. The assessee&#039;s challenge to the search warrant was therefore rejected as outside the statutory appeal and unsupported on the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>