<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 395 - ITAT PUNE-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71368</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the assessment order dated 25th February 2005 to be within the permissible time limit. Several additions to the undisclosed income were deleted by the Tribunal due to lack of proper investigation and non-compliance with earlier directions, including amounts related to seized documents and statements, commissions, unexplained income, deposits, and transactions. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 10:08:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 395 - ITAT PUNE-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71368</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the assessment order dated 25th February 2005 to be within the permissible time limit. Several additions to the undisclosed income were deleted by the Tribunal due to lack of proper investigation and non-compliance with earlier directions, including amounts related to seized documents and statements, commissions, unexplained income, deposits, and transactions. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>