<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (6) TMI 202 - ITAT PUNE-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71350</link>
    <description>Reassessment initiated after four years under section 147 was held invalid where the assessee had disclosed all primary facts in the original assessment; a mere incorrect inference by the Assessing Officer did not amount to failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts, so reopening lacked jurisdiction. For section 80HHC, job work and processing charges integrally linked to manufacturing were treated as operating income, not receipts of the kind covered by clause (baa) of the Explanation, and were therefore not subject to the 90% exclusion in computing turnover.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (6) TMI 202 - ITAT PUNE-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71350</link>
      <description>Reassessment initiated after four years under section 147 was held invalid where the assessee had disclosed all primary facts in the original assessment; a mere incorrect inference by the Assessing Officer did not amount to failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts, so reopening lacked jurisdiction. For section 80HHC, job work and processing charges integrally linked to manufacturing were treated as operating income, not receipts of the kind covered by clause (baa) of the Explanation, and were therefore not subject to the 90% exclusion in computing turnover.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>