<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 279 - ITAT PUNE-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71343</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment order under section 158BD was void ab initio as the Assessing Officer failed to record his satisfaction, rendering the order invalid. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the judgment, ruling in favor of the assessee and allowing the appeal. The merits of the specific additions were not addressed as the primary ground regarding the assessment order&#039;s validity was decisive in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:53:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 279 - ITAT PUNE-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71343</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessment order under section 158BD was void ab initio as the Assessing Officer failed to record his satisfaction, rendering the order invalid. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the judgment, ruling in favor of the assessee and allowing the appeal. The merits of the specific additions were not addressed as the primary ground regarding the assessment order&#039;s validity was decisive in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>