<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 333 - ITAT PUNE-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71335</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the CIT&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 263, upheld the revenue classification of expenses for the Ratnagiri project, allowed deduction of debenture issue expenses, interest on debentures, and premium on debentures. Entertainment expenses were not pressed, and Ratnagiri project expenses were allowed as part of the existing business. The Tribunal emphasized the expansion of the existing business and the revenue nature of expenses, leading to a favorable outcome for the assessee on multiple issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 17:25:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 333 - ITAT PUNE-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71335</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the CIT&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 263, upheld the revenue classification of expenses for the Ratnagiri project, allowed deduction of debenture issue expenses, interest on debentures, and premium on debentures. Entertainment expenses were not pressed, and Ratnagiri project expenses were allowed as part of the existing business. The Tribunal emphasized the expansion of the existing business and the revenue nature of expenses, leading to a favorable outcome for the assessee on multiple issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>