<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 339 - ITAT PUNE-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71310</link>
    <description>Section 79 can be restricted by the Indo-German tax treaty where a foreign-parented Indian subsidiary is placed at a disadvantage compared with an Indian-parented subsidiary; on that basis, loss carry-forward could not be denied if the German parent&#039;s shares were listed on a recognised German stock exchange, and the matter was remitted for limited verification. The disallowance of technical know-how expenditure under section 35AB was remitted for fresh adjudication because the foundational year&#039;s claim had not been properly argued and the record was incomplete. Expenditure on designing and planning a new factory layout was also remitted for de novo consideration, the record being insufficient to decide whether the claim was in substance a business loss arising from abandonment of capital work.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109638" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 339 - ITAT PUNE-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71310</link>
      <description>Section 79 can be restricted by the Indo-German tax treaty where a foreign-parented Indian subsidiary is placed at a disadvantage compared with an Indian-parented subsidiary; on that basis, loss carry-forward could not be denied if the German parent&#039;s shares were listed on a recognised German stock exchange, and the matter was remitted for limited verification. The disallowance of technical know-how expenditure under section 35AB was remitted for fresh adjudication because the foundational year&#039;s claim had not been properly argued and the record was incomplete. Expenditure on designing and planning a new factory layout was also remitted for de novo consideration, the record being insufficient to decide whether the claim was in substance a business loss arising from abandonment of capital work.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>