<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 243 - ITAT PUNE-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71303</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining the Rs. 18,00,000 addition to the assessee&#039;s income was unjustified. It emphasized that accounting methods must be consistent and supported by cogent evidence. The Tribunal found that an admission contrary to law does not create estoppel, and assessments must align with the Income-tax Act. Consequently, the Rs. 18,00,000 addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 18:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 243 - ITAT PUNE-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71303</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining the Rs. 18,00,000 addition to the assessee&#039;s income was unjustified. It emphasized that accounting methods must be consistent and supported by cogent evidence. The Tribunal found that an admission contrary to law does not create estoppel, and assessments must align with the Income-tax Act. Consequently, the Rs. 18,00,000 addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>