<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 247 - ITAT PUNE-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71301</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the land in question was agricultural, as evidenced by its classification in revenue records and actual agricultural use, despite its inclusion in an industrial zone. Consequently, the gain from its sale was exempt from capital gains tax. The Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 15,12,525/- as capital gain by the AO, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 247 - ITAT PUNE-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71301</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the land in question was agricultural, as evidenced by its classification in revenue records and actual agricultural use, despite its inclusion in an industrial zone. Consequently, the gain from its sale was exempt from capital gains tax. The Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 15,12,525/- as capital gain by the AO, allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>