<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 330 - ITAT PUNE-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71292</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the compensation received by the assessee was partly revenue and partly capital in nature. Rs. 1.02 crore was treated as revenue receipts, and Rs. 48 lakhs as capital receipts. The appeal was partly allowed in this manner. The issue of assessing the income in the assessment year 1991-92 instead of 1992-93 was raised but not substantively argued or supported and was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:52:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 330 - ITAT PUNE-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71292</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the compensation received by the assessee was partly revenue and partly capital in nature. Rs. 1.02 crore was treated as revenue receipts, and Rs. 48 lakhs as capital receipts. The appeal was partly allowed in this manner. The issue of assessing the income in the assessment year 1991-92 instead of 1992-93 was raised but not substantively argued or supported and was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>