<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 329 - ITAT PUNE-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71288</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the disallowance of the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under section 80-IB(10) for the assessment year 2001-02. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, concluding that the housing project&#039;s plot area was less than one acre, failing to meet the statutory requirement. The argument that the plot area exceeded one acre when combined with open space from another entity was rejected. The Tribunal emphasized strict adherence to the statutory language, finding the compromise arrangement insufficient to satisfy the conditions of section 80-IB(10). Consequently, the claim for deduction was deemed inadmissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 329 - ITAT PUNE-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71288</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the disallowance of the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under section 80-IB(10) for the assessment year 2001-02. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, concluding that the housing project&#039;s plot area was less than one acre, failing to meet the statutory requirement. The argument that the plot area exceeded one acre when combined with open space from another entity was rejected. The Tribunal emphasized strict adherence to the statutory language, finding the compromise arrangement insufficient to satisfy the conditions of section 80-IB(10). Consequently, the claim for deduction was deemed inadmissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71288</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>