<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 291 - ITAT PUNE-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71274</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the allowance of remuneration to partners representing their HUF&#039;s as Karta under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1993-94. The Tribunal interpreted the amended provision of section 40(b) to permit such deductions, aligning with past decisions that partners, including Kartas of HUF&#039;s, are considered individuals for partnership purposes. The decision emphasized that the remuneration to Kartas representing HUF&#039;s was allowable under the new provision, rejecting the revenue&#039;s contention that an HUF cannot be a working partner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 291 - ITAT PUNE-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71274</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the allowance of remuneration to partners representing their HUF&#039;s as Karta under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1993-94. The Tribunal interpreted the amended provision of section 40(b) to permit such deductions, aligning with past decisions that partners, including Kartas of HUF&#039;s, are considered individuals for partnership purposes. The decision emphasized that the remuneration to Kartas representing HUF&#039;s was allowable under the new provision, rejecting the revenue&#039;s contention that an HUF cannot be a working partner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>