<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 288 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71259</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, holding that the reopening of the assessment after four years was invalid due to the absence of any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings and the addition of Rs. 2 lakhs under Section 68 were also rendered invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 288 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71259</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, holding that the reopening of the assessment after four years was invalid due to the absence of any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for the assessment. Consequently, the reassessment proceedings and the addition of Rs. 2 lakhs under Section 68 were also rendered invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>