<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 199 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71246</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the firm was dissolved on 1st April 1995, and there was no closing stock on the dissolution date. Consequently, the entire addition due to alleged undervaluation of closing stock was deleted. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, while the Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:21:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 199 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71246</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the firm was dissolved on 1st April 1995, and there was no closing stock on the dissolution date. Consequently, the entire addition due to alleged undervaluation of closing stock was deleted. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, while the Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>