<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (6) TMI 150 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71227</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The reopening of the assessment under Section 147(b) and the disallowance of depreciation were upheld. The charging of interest under Section 139(8) was subject to verification, and the charging of interest under Section 215 was limited to the date of the regular assessment. The additional ground for reducing the disallowance was not admitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:28:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (6) TMI 150 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71227</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed. The reopening of the assessment under Section 147(b) and the disallowance of depreciation were upheld. The charging of interest under Section 139(8) was subject to verification, and the charging of interest under Section 215 was limited to the date of the regular assessment. The additional ground for reducing the disallowance was not admitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>