<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 178 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71224</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) imposed on the assessee for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. It found that the assessee deliberately failed to disclose commission payments to its partner&#039;s proprietary concerns, leading to tax evasion. The Tribunal determined that the penalty was justified, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty. The Tribunal emphasized that the penalty was for inaccurate particulars of income, not concealment, and that the assessee had ample opportunity to present its case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:20:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 178 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71224</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) imposed on the assessee for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. It found that the assessee deliberately failed to disclose commission payments to its partner&#039;s proprietary concerns, leading to tax evasion. The Tribunal determined that the penalty was justified, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty. The Tribunal emphasized that the penalty was for inaccurate particulars of income, not concealment, and that the assessee had ample opportunity to present its case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>