<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 217 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71221</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, determining that the contracts for supply of material, construction, and labour-cum-erection were composite. It was held that Section 194C applied to the contract for material supply, TDS was applicable to the payment of Rs. 72.60 crores, and the certificate issued under Section 197(1) did not have retrospective effect. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 217 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71221</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, determining that the contracts for supply of material, construction, and labour-cum-erection were composite. It was held that Section 194C applied to the contract for material supply, TDS was applicable to the payment of Rs. 72.60 crores, and the certificate issued under Section 197(1) did not have retrospective effect. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>