<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 316 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71194</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 36,07,720 as undisclosed income from Visakha Precious Stones. Relief of Rs. 1 lakh was granted for the income from the Liquor Syndicate. The issue of surcharge was left pending for a future decision by the Special Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 316 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71194</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 36,07,720 as undisclosed income from Visakha Precious Stones. Relief of Rs. 1 lakh was granted for the income from the Liquor Syndicate. The issue of surcharge was left pending for a future decision by the Special Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>