<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 315 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71191</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment as void ab initio due to non-compliance with the time limit under s. 158BE. It directed the AO to adjust the treatment of duplicate books, considering only unconfirmed sales as the assessee&#039;s. It also recalculated undisclosed income, reducing sales outside books and commission income, and addressed stock discrepancies by valuing excess stock at a lower rate. This resulted in partial relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 315 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71191</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment as void ab initio due to non-compliance with the time limit under s. 158BE. It directed the AO to adjust the treatment of duplicate books, considering only unconfirmed sales as the assessee&#039;s. It also recalculated undisclosed income, reducing sales outside books and commission income, and addressed stock discrepancies by valuing excess stock at a lower rate. This resulted in partial relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>