<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (7) TMI 150 - ITAT TRIVANDRUM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71169</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals, ruling that the Income Tax Officer lacked jurisdiction to rectify orders due to the merger of assessment and appellate orders. The decision emphasized the substantive nature of section 154(1A) and the impact of merger on rectification proceedings, concluding that the ITO&#039;s powers were limited by the legislative provisions and the interplay between substantive and procedural aspects of the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:46:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (7) TMI 150 - ITAT TRIVANDRUM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71169</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals, ruling that the Income Tax Officer lacked jurisdiction to rectify orders due to the merger of assessment and appellate orders. The decision emphasized the substantive nature of section 154(1A) and the impact of merger on rectification proceedings, concluding that the ITO&#039;s powers were limited by the legislative provisions and the interplay between substantive and procedural aspects of the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>