<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (7) TMI 93 - ITAT TRIVANDRUM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71168</link>
    <description>Sawing timber logs purchased from unregistered dealers into planks, scantlings and sizes was treated as manufacture for purchase tax purposes under Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, section 5A, because the majority applied the test of commercial identity and held that the process produced goods with a distinct character and use from the original logs. On that reasoning, the statutory condition for levy was satisfied. A dissenting view considered the process to be only cutting the same timber into smaller pieces, without creation of a commercially different commodity, and therefore outside manufacture. The core distinction drawn is between mere alteration in form and transformation into a commercially distinct article.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:45:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (7) TMI 93 - ITAT TRIVANDRUM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71168</link>
      <description>Sawing timber logs purchased from unregistered dealers into planks, scantlings and sizes was treated as manufacture for purchase tax purposes under Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, section 5A, because the majority applied the test of commercial identity and held that the process produced goods with a distinct character and use from the original logs. On that reasoning, the statutory condition for levy was satisfied. A dissenting view considered the process to be only cutting the same timber into smaller pieces, without creation of a commercially different commodity, and therefore outside manufacture. The core distinction drawn is between mere alteration in form and transformation into a commercially distinct article.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>