<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (12) TMI 65 - ITAT PATNA-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71152</link>
    <description>Salary paid to an employee engaged to protect an assessee&#039;s interest in partnership firms under dissolution was treated as a business expense incurred to safeguard an income-producing interest. As the assessee was a partner in both firms and the appointment was found justified on the facts, the expenditure was held to be laid out for the protection of her business and income interests. The salary payment was therefore allowable as a deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:15:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (12) TMI 65 - ITAT PATNA-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71152</link>
      <description>Salary paid to an employee engaged to protect an assessee&#039;s interest in partnership firms under dissolution was treated as a business expense incurred to safeguard an income-producing interest. As the assessee was a partner in both firms and the appointment was found justified on the facts, the expenditure was held to be laid out for the protection of her business and income interests. The salary payment was therefore allowable as a deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>