<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (4) TMI 80 - ITAT PATNA-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71142</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, could not be upheld. The additions made to the trading account and bank account were deemed not to constitute concealment of income, and the non-addition of inadmissible expenses did not warrant a penalty. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty order was not justified and canceled it, allowing the appeal in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:48:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109474" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (4) TMI 80 - ITAT PATNA-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71142</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, could not be upheld. The additions made to the trading account and bank account were deemed not to constitute concealment of income, and the non-addition of inadmissible expenses did not warrant a penalty. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty order was not justified and canceled it, allowing the appeal in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>