<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 107 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71092</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Competent Authority was not justified in initiating acquisition proceedings under Section 269C of the Income Tax Act as the market value of the property did not exceed the stated consideration by more than 25%. It was held that the Valuation Cell&#039;s report should be accepted, and proper deductions for the location and situation of the land should be allowed. The Tribunal canceled the order of the IAC (Acq.) and allowed the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 12:30:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 107 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71092</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the Competent Authority was not justified in initiating acquisition proceedings under Section 269C of the Income Tax Act as the market value of the property did not exceed the stated consideration by more than 25%. It was held that the Valuation Cell&#039;s report should be accepted, and proper deductions for the location and situation of the land should be allowed. The Tribunal canceled the order of the IAC (Acq.) and allowed the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>