<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 127 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71088</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Managing Director of the Indian company was competent to file appeals on behalf of the Russian technicians deputed to render services, allowing all fifteen appeals and restoring them for fresh consideration. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of upholding the right to appeal unless conclusively forfeited or abandoned, citing legal precedents supporting the competence of the Managing Director in representing the technicians in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 12:17:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 127 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71088</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Managing Director of the Indian company was competent to file appeals on behalf of the Russian technicians deputed to render services, allowing all fifteen appeals and restoring them for fresh consideration. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of upholding the right to appeal unless conclusively forfeited or abandoned, citing legal precedents supporting the competence of the Managing Director in representing the technicians in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>