<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (4) TMI 176 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71073</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed by the Income Tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, ruling in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties cannot be imposed based on conjectures and surmises, highlighting the Department&#039;s burden of proof to demonstrate the estimate was false. As the estimate was filed with the Department and no evidence indicated its falsity, the penalty order was canceled, granting full relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (4) TMI 176 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71073</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed by the Income Tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, ruling in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized that penalties cannot be imposed based on conjectures and surmises, highlighting the Department&#039;s burden of proof to demonstrate the estimate was false. As the estimate was filed with the Department and no evidence indicated its falsity, the penalty order was canceled, granting full relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>