<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (8) TMI 162 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71066</link>
    <description>The assessing officer estimated gross profits at 35% for certain years for a registered firm operating a hotel and restaurant, leading to additional profits. The AAC reduced the estimated gross profit rate to 30%, and further to 25% considering income from the Bar. Interest on a construction loan was disallowed by the assessing officer, but the Tribunal deleted the disallowance, recognizing the loan&#039;s business purpose. An unexplained investment addition was reduced by the AAC and further restricted by the Tribunal, acknowledging the expenditure recorded in the books. The appeals were partly allowed, resulting in modifications to the assessments of the firm and its partners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:45:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (8) TMI 162 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71066</link>
      <description>The assessing officer estimated gross profits at 35% for certain years for a registered firm operating a hotel and restaurant, leading to additional profits. The AAC reduced the estimated gross profit rate to 30%, and further to 25% considering income from the Bar. Interest on a construction loan was disallowed by the assessing officer, but the Tribunal deleted the disallowance, recognizing the loan&#039;s business purpose. An unexplained investment addition was reduced by the AAC and further restricted by the Tribunal, acknowledging the expenditure recorded in the books. The appeals were partly allowed, resulting in modifications to the assessments of the firm and its partners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>