<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 167 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71065</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the AAC to delete the addition of Rs. 38,098 under the interest account. The Tribunal found that the interest payments were made to the Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs), who were creditors of the firm, and not to the individual partners. It was determined that the AAC&#039;s interpretation of the law was correct, and the Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:43:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 167 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71065</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the AAC to delete the addition of Rs. 38,098 under the interest account. The Tribunal found that the interest payments were made to the Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs), who were creditors of the firm, and not to the individual partners. It was determined that the AAC&#039;s interpretation of the law was correct, and the Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>