<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (9) TMI 166 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71063</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to grant registration to the firm for the assessment year 1975-76 despite Form No. 12 not being signed by all partners. The Tribunal ruled that partners existing at the time of declaration could sign the form, especially in cases of partnership changes. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing practical considerations and the timing of partnership alterations in registration matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:41:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (9) TMI 166 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71063</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to grant registration to the firm for the assessment year 1975-76 despite Form No. 12 not being signed by all partners. The Tribunal ruled that partners existing at the time of declaration could sign the form, especially in cases of partnership changes. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing practical considerations and the timing of partnership alterations in registration matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>