<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (3) TMI 113 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71055</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal and allowed the cross-objection in full, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1973-74. The delay in filing the return was deemed justified due to reasons beyond the assessee&#039;s control, particularly the delay caused by auditors in furnishing audited accounts. The Tribunal found the delay in filing the return reasonable, ultimately leading to the cancellation of the penalty order imposed by the Income Tax Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:28:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (3) TMI 113 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71055</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal and allowed the cross-objection in full, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(a) of the IT Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1973-74. The delay in filing the return was deemed justified due to reasons beyond the assessee&#039;s control, particularly the delay caused by auditors in furnishing audited accounts. The Tribunal found the delay in filing the return reasonable, ultimately leading to the cancellation of the penalty order imposed by the Income Tax Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>