<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 139 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71040</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the orders of the Assessing Officer, dismissing the appeals filed by the assessee. It concluded that the orders were proper and valid, determining that the payments to the foreign company constituted fees for technical services under section 9(1)(vii)(b) of the I.T. Act. The tribunal found the assessee correctly treated as an agent under section 163(1)(c) and held that the orders were not time-barred as no specific time limit was prescribed for such orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:48:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 139 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71040</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the orders of the Assessing Officer, dismissing the appeals filed by the assessee. It concluded that the orders were proper and valid, determining that the payments to the foreign company constituted fees for technical services under section 9(1)(vii)(b) of the I.T. Act. The tribunal found the assessee correctly treated as an agent under section 163(1)(c) and held that the orders were not time-barred as no specific time limit was prescribed for such orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>