<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 107 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71027</link>
    <description>The majority opinion held that the godowns let out by the assessee were used for its business and therefore not considered as assets under section 40(3)(vi) of the Finance Act, 1983. As a result, the assessee was found not liable for wealth-tax on the value of the godowns. The appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the matter was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 107 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71027</link>
      <description>The majority opinion held that the godowns let out by the assessee were used for its business and therefore not considered as assets under section 40(3)(vi) of the Finance Act, 1983. As a result, the assessee was found not liable for wealth-tax on the value of the godowns. The appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the matter was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>